IN CONVERSATION WITH INNOCENT MOLOI

Loading player...
A Muslim social worker’s firearm licence application was reportedly rejected after she was allegedly told that her application photograph, in which she was wearing a hijab, “may not be accepted”. The incident has raised questions about whether South African law allows religious head coverings in firearm licence photographs and whether wearing a hijab can influence the outcome of a firearm licence application.
Under the Firearms Control Act 60 of 2000, applicants must meet specific requirements relating to competency, suitability and the lawful possession of a firearm. The Act does not list wearing a hijab or any other religious head covering as a reason for refusing a firearm licence application.
SAPS’s published requirements for a new firearm licence include two recent passport-sized colour photographs with a neutral background, as well as identification, a competency certificate and supporting documents. The published requirements do not expressly prohibit applicants from wearing religious head coverings in their photographs.
The issue is not entirely new. In March 2021, Parliament’s Portfolio Committee on Police called for answers after a Muslim woman alleged that her firearm licence application had been refused because she was wearing a headscarf in her application photograph. The committee raised concerns that, if the allegation was substantiated, it could amount to religious discrimination.
The Constitution provides important protections in this context. Section 9 guarantees equality before the law and prohibits unfair discrimination by the state on grounds including religion, conscience and belief. Section 15 protects everyone’s right to freedom of conscience, religion, thought, belief and opinion.
However, wearing a hijab does not automatically entitle someone to a firearm licence. Firearm ownership is regulated by the Firearms Control Act, and applicants must satisfy all the prescribed legal requirements.
The key issue, therefore, is whether a person who meets the statutory requirements can be treated differently because they wear a religious head covering. While SAPS requires applicants to submit photographs that meet certain specifications, neither the Act nor the published requirements expressly identify a hijab as a disqualifying factor.
The distinction between photographic requirements and substantive firearm-licensing requirements is therefore important. Any specific instruction given by an individual Designated Firearms Officer should be assessed against the applicable SAPS requirements, the Firearms Control Act and South Africa’s constitutional protections against unfair discrimination.
19 Aug English South Africa Entertainment News · Music Interviews

Other recent episodes

IN CONVERSATION WITH THAKHANI KHOROMMBI

Health experts and government officials are calling for a stronger focus on prevention, healthier lifestyle choices and harm reduction as South Africa continues to face a growing burden of chronic diseases. The call was made at the Wellness Collective Summit, hosted by WomenCan at Pere House on Tuesday. The event…
19 Aug 14 min

IN CONVERSATION WITH REFILOE NT'SEKHE

The Gauteng Department of Social Development has 170 critical frontline posts currently vacant, including 102 social worker positions and 74 child and youth care worker positions. These professionals provide essential services to vulnerable residents, including children affected by abuse and neglect, victims of gender-based violence, older people and communities dealing…
19 Aug 9 min

IN CONVERSATION WITH Onwabile Lubhelwana

The Gauteng Department of Education is investigating allegations of sexual harassment involving an educator and a 17-year-old Grade 12 learner at Minerva Secondary School. According to the department, the alleged inappropriate communication between the educator and the learner began in June 2026 and reportedly continued through WhatsApp and other interactions…
19 Aug 7 min

IN CONVERSATION WITH TIEGO KHOZA- POLITICAL ANALYST

Today’s proceedings at the Madlanga Commission of Inquiry placed alleged underworld figure Vusimuzi “Cat” Matlala firmly in the spotlight. Appearing under subpoena at the Brigitte Mabandla Justice College in Pretoria, Matlala repeatedly invoked his constitutional right against self-incrimination when questioned about the controversial R360 million SAPS Medicare24 tender, a contract…
18 Aug 8 min

IN CONVERSATION WITH PHUTHANANG MOTSIELWA- TAX EXPERT

South Africa’s gig economy is expanding rapidly, with more people earning money outside their monthly salaries through Uber driving, freelancing, content creation, tutoring, or selling products online. SARS requires all of this income to be declared, regardless of the amount. Failure to declare can lead to audits, penalties, and backdated…
18 Aug 16 min